Managing Director - Head of Global Asset Management
Weekly Investment View – 29 May 2017
The bell-weather S&P 500 index continued to make step-by-step progress to new all-time closing highs last week, finishing up a further 1.4%, and is now 8.5% ahead for the year-to-date. The NASDAQ Composite closed up 2.0% over the week, continuing to reflect Information Technology having had the strongest recent positive earnings and revenue surprises, with more and more commentators saying just how impressive the earnings momentum has been. This has gone some way to offset observations that a bubble is being inflated. Falls in Banking and Energy stocks held the STOXX Europe 600 index to slightly better than unchanged. Japan’s Topix rose by 0.6%, held down by losses for oil stocks. In other major equity markets, the UK FTSE100 index closed at a new all-time closing high, up 1.0% over the week, driven mainly by a 1.8% weakening in sterling (to $1.2804) largely on the back of a narrowing of Prime Minister Theresa May’s Conservative Party’s lead in the polls to 5% (from a high of over 20% last month). China’s CSI 300 index rallied by just over 1%, with investors mindful of next month’s MSCI Emerging Market index review covering Chinese ‘A’ shares (i.e. onshore, rather than Hong Kong-quoted), rather than Moody’s downgrading of China’s sovereign debt to A1 (from Aa3). In US data, the upward revision in first-quarter GDP growth from an annualized 0.7%, to 1.2% was relevant in terms of the higher starting assumptions for current quarter growth, and the knock-on effect regarding the probability of a Fed rate hike at the June FOMC meeting. Meanwhile, the minutes from the Federal Reserve meeting held earlier this month reinforced the sense that the majority of members wanted to hike/continue to ‘normalize’ rates, and that the discussion about starting to gradually reverse its QE before the end of this year was becoming more serious. The detail in the minutes made it clear that some FOMC members were concerned that exactly how such a decision is communicated must be handled very carefully, so as to minimize adverse market reaction.
“Oil market observers are now wondering how the end of production restraint will be handled”
Regarding a Fed June rate increase, depending on exactly which method is chosen, the market-derived odds of this rose back above 90% last week. Such considerations helped the recently-weak dollar index (DXY) to put in a steadier performance (+0.3% over the week). Linked to this was the inability of the euro to break through upside resistance against the dollar at just below 1.12, following its rally in recent weeks from the 1.06 level. In fixed income, the bell-weather US 10-year Treasury yield closed a basis point firmer (at 2.2465%), with market participants inclined to see this as underlining continued ‘risk-on’ potential in other asset classes (a clear break of the 2.20-2.60% range to the downside would signal equity ‘risk-off’). Turning to the more policy-sensitive US 2-year Treasury yield, this was just over two basis points firmer over the week (at 1.2937%), consistent with the Fed hike assumptions mentioned earlier, as well as with the measured bounce in the dollar. Oil prices were volatile during the week, including a $2.36/barrel fall (to a closing low of $48.90 on Thursday), before a close of $49.80 at the end of the week. The nine-month extension (to March, 2018) of the previous deal reached by OPEC/NOPEC had already been fully discounted, so it was largely a case of ‘buy the rumour, sell the news’. Also, probably unreasonably, some observers expressed dismay that there had not been an even deeper overall production cut. Some remain skeptical of the whole arrangement, saying that (a) KSA has had to shoulder too much of the reduction, (b) US shale producers will simply continue to fill the gap, (c) Iran is continuing to increase production, (d) some producers have cheated, and (e) there is concern about what happens after the stated 1.8 million barrel/day production limit expires. It had also been hoped by some that output restraint could also include a move ‘downstream’ i.e. including oil products, with the thought that Saudi Arabia might take the lead in this.
“It is looking as though the dollar has reached a low”
INVESTMENT SUMMARY: Our Asset Allocation Committee has been relatively bullish about the US dollar vs. its peers since the summer of last year, yet the dollar (looking at its index) is now trading just below its level at the time Donald Trump and the Republicans won the US elections last November. One of the determinants of exchange rate pairs is relative real economic growth between the relevant countries, and investors’ perceptions of these over the medium-term. Within developed markets, we expect the US economy to once again outperform the likes of Europe and Japan as and when a degree of extra fiscal stimulus and regulatory relaxation can be successfully applied. The US economy is at (or beyond) full employment, depending on one’s exact definition of it, and consumer confidence remains at a high level, even if retail sales have been below-par in recent months. The US Federal Reserve in the minutes of its meeting earlier this month expressed the view that US first quarter economic weakness was transitory, and that the second quarter would see a rebound. The minutes underline the basic desire of the majority of FOMC members to remain on a path of rate normalization, tempered as always by the ‘data dependency’ proviso.
“Trump’s lack of apparent progress has not prevented new highs in equities”
The Dollar Index (DXY) hit a closing high of 103.30 in late December, and has since corrected by almost 5.7%, influenced by (a) the rollout of the Trump Administration’s reflationary policies meeting political resistance – and the probable reality that achieving quite so much by an early date was rather unrealistic in practice, and (b) the fact that economic surprises in the Eurozone and Japan have come in on the upside. Trump had wanted to get his new healthcare proposals through Congress first, before proceeding to his other agenda items, but the initial failure of this wasted time. As the President has admitted, his new job is more difficult than he expected. The resulting apparent lack of ‘hard’ policy execution, together with ongoing ‘background noise’ (spats with the media, plus the potentially more serious developments related to James Comey and whether Russia interfered in the presidential election) have held the dollar down. Recent talk of possible impeachment appears somewhat premature to us, although there are some Republicans (and investors) who would rather see Vice President Mike Pence with his hand on the tiller – at least some time after next year’s Congressional elections. Turning to European politics, various election results have passed without any nationalist surprises, and Theresa May has called a ‘snap’ election for the 8th June. Mrs May is very likely to win this, making for a very much better-defined (although nonetheless very tough) period of Brexit negotiations. Although a degree of European political uncertainty remains (in Germany, Italy, and Greek issues), the overall world economy is seeing growth of above 3% underlined by IMF estimates. The net result has been a positive effect on risk assets such as equities, and an investing environment that is at the same time quite fixed income-friendly: global growth is good, without being ‘too’ good, and short-to-medium term inflationary expectations remain below 2%. The latter will make it more likely that businesses will have pricing power, aiding corporate earnings growth (this has already been evident in the US SME sector, a very welcome development).
“The ‘Trumpflation premium’ has disappeared – the slightest good news could bring some of it back”
In summary, rate differentials – led by US normalization almost certainly proceeding faster there than in Europe and certainly Japan – should favour the US dollar over other currencies. The ‘Trumpflation’ premium has largely come out of US asset prices, with expectations now quite low that he will succeed in reflating the economy; we believe this is probably over-discounted in today’s DXY quote, indeed to the point from which it wouldn’t take much good news to support and rally the dollar. Meanwhile, especially the yen has benefited from safe-haven flows, somewhat at odds with the ongoing structural difficulties Japan faces. We admittedly recently recommended the dollar at levels of just below 100 on the DXY, and we have not fundamentally changed our mind. Having said that, good trading lore would suggest that a break below the 96.80 technical level (on a ‘close-only’ basis) would lead us to question maintaining our bullish view. For now, however, we remain dollar positive.
“The Asset Allocation Committee voted to keep its ‘risk-on’ strategy”
In last week’s report we described how our Asset Allocation Committee had at the end of the previous week discussed the possible wisdom of taking some risk off the table (in the main by reducing its overweight positions in equities). The other side of this particular coin is the Committee’s underweight in global fixed income, although in terms of implied volatility it is the equity overweight that contributes by far the most risk. The discussion continued, and as our readers would expect this also begged questions about whether or not to keep the full hedge on euro exposure (i.e. whether to continue to expect the euro to underperform the dollar). These decisions went to a vote. A majority of members did not believe the markets are entering a ‘risk-off’ phase, with the small proviso that it was appreciated that the major European and US stock market indices did appear vulnerable to at least a short-term correction (taken to be 5% or less), although this was not sufficient to act upon (i.e. to have confidence that it would be worthwhile selling, with the intention of buying back in). On balance the Committee believed more equity upside would be seen in the coming months. In other words, the members decided to stay with its bullish medium-term view on equities, having not thought that the required 8-10% downside move was imminent.
“Recent euro strength does not change our expectations of seeing euro/dollar parity”
Regarding the dollar, of course the transcript above makes our stance clear. There was not a majority of members in favour of reducing or closing the euro currency hedge. The Committee collectively believes the recent rally in the euro/dollar is only an upward correction, and not a reversal in the dominant down-trend. Many of the causes of this latest rise (short-term disappointing US economic data, and diminished political risks and positive growth expectations in the Eurozone) appear to have already been taken into account in the exchange rate. Indeed the central view is that the euro/dollar would decline towards parity in the quarters ahead. Accordingly, there appeared to be little reason to change the current Asset Allocation central scenario at this time, thus maintaining the major ‘risk-on’ positioning suggested in the Global Investment Outlook 2017.
This report has been prepared and issued by the Global Asset Management (“GAM”) of the National Bank of Abu Dhabi PJSC (“NBAD”) outlining particular services provided by GAM and does not constitute or form part of any offer or invitation to sell, or any solicitation of any offer to purchase or subscribe for, any shares in NBAD or otherwise or a recommendation for a particular person to enter into any transaction or to adopt any strategy nor shall it or any part of it form the basis of or be relied on in connection with any contract therefore. This report was prepared exclusively for the benefit and internal use of NBAD. This report is incomplete without reference to, and should be viewed solely in conjunction with the associated oral briefing provided by GAM. The report is proprie-tary to GAM and may not be disclosed to any third party or used for any other purpose without the prior written consent of GAM. The information in this report reflects prevailing conditions and our views as of this date, which are accordingly subject to change. In preparing this report, we have relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of all the information available from public sources or which was otherwise reviewed by us. In addition, our analysis are not and do not purport to be appraisals of the assets, stock or business of the recipient. Even when this presentation contains a kind of appraisal, it should be considered preliminary, suitable only for the purpose described herein and not be disclosed or otherwise used without the prior written consent of GAM. NBAD clients may already hold positions in the assets subject to this report and may accordingly benefit from the buying or selling of such assets as referred to in this report. This document does not purport to set out any advice, recommendation or representation on the suitability of any in-vestment, transaction or product (as referred to in this document or otherwise), for potential purchasers. Potential purchasers should determine for themselves the relevance of the information contained in this document and the decision to purchase any investment contained herein should be based on such investigation and analysis as they themselves deem necessary. Before entering into any transaction potential purchasers should ensure that they fully understand the poten-tial risks and rewards of that transaction (including, without limitation, all financial, legal, regulatory, tax and accounting consequences of entering into the transaction and an understanding as to how the transaction will perform under changing conditions) and that they independently determine that the transac-tion is appropriate for them given their objectives, experience, financial and operational resources and other relevant circumstances. Potential purchasers should consider consulting with such advisers and experts as they deem necessary to assist them in making these determinations and should not rely on NBAD for such purposes. NBAD is acting solely in the capacity of a potential arm’s-length contractual counterparty and not as a financial adviser or fiduciary in any transaction unless we have otherwise expressly agreed so to act in writing. NBAD does not provide any accounting, tax, regulatory or legal advice. NBAD is licensed by the Central Bank of the UAE.
NBAD London Branch is Authorized by the Prudential Regulation Authority. Subject to regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority and limited regulation by the Prudential Regulation Authority. Details about the extent of our regulation by the Prudential Regulation Authority are available from NBAD London branch on request. Registered in England & Wales: Company No: FC009142: VAT No: GB245 3301 91.
NBAD Paris Branch is licensed by the French Prudential Control Authority as a credit institution. NBAD Paris is registered in France under the company number: RCS Paris B 314 939 547.
This publication is for your information only and is not intended as an offer, or a solicitation of an offer, to buy or sell any investment or other specific product. Certain services and products are subject to legal restrictions and cannot be offered worldwide on an unrestricted basis and/or may not be eligible for sale to all investors. All information and opinions expressed in this document were obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith, but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to its accuracy or completeness. All information and opinions as well as any prices indicated are currently as of the date of this report, and are subject to change without notice. The analysis contained herein is based on numerous assumptions. Different assumptions could result in materially different results. At any time the National Bank of Abu Dhabi PJSC and/or NBAD Private Bank (Suisse) SA may have a long or short position, or deal as principal or agent, in relevant securities or provide advisory or other services to the issuer of relevant securities or to a company connected with an issu-er. Some investments may not be readily realizable since the market in the securities is illiquid and therefore valuing the investment and identifying the risk to which you are exposed may be difficult to quantify. Futures and options trading is considered risky. Past performance of an investment is no guarantee for its future performance. Some investments may be subject to sudden and large falls in value and on realization you may receive back less than you invested or may be required to pay more. Changes in foreign exchange rates may have an adverse effect on the price, value or income of an investment. National Bank of Abu Dhabi PJSC expressly prohibits the distribution and transfer of this document to third parties for any reason. National Bank of Abu Dhabi PJSC and/or NBAD Private Bank (Suisse) SA will not be liable for any claims or lawsuits from any third parties arising from the use or distribution of this document. This report is for distribution only under such circumstances as may be permitted by applicable law. The “Directives on the Independence of Financial Research”, issued by the Board of Directors of the Swiss Bankers Association (SBA) do not apply.