Menu

Taking Cues From The Speeches

Weekly Investment View – 05 March 2017

After providing a general discussion of last week’s events in the markets, this week’s report covers: President Trump’s inaugural speech to Congress, Janet Yellen’s important monetary policy speech in Chicago, and the revised official estimate of recent Indian GDP growth in the light of demonetization, followed by a discussion of last week’s MENA bond issuance.

The markets began with an almost eerie feeling that if investors didn’t soon receive some more ‘small print’ regarding the Trump Administration’s policies - and preferably in the President’s inaugural speech last Wednesday - then a market correction might ensue, especially as an early week chorus of Federal Reserve officials signaled very clearly that the US Fed funds rate should rise this month. Perhaps unsurprisingly, Trump’s speech delivered little by way of details, as the new Administration clearly needs more time to engineer policy specifics that will be credible, especially given the planned extent of them. This speech was made against the background of Democrat calls for new Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ resignation over claims that he misled the Senate regarding the nature of any contact he had with Russian officialdom in the period before the election. During mid-week the S&P had a rare down-day (we had been hoping for some, to restore a sense of normality, despite being bullish). Yet the equity market downside was short-lived, with futures markets eventually factoring-in a 94% probability of an FOMC rate hike this month (up strongly from a 36% reading at the end of the previous week), and the S&P500 index closed up 0.70% over the week. European large-caps did even better, being up 3.01% on the week, despite ongoing machinations in the run-up to the French elections. Japanese equities rose 0.50% over the week. The dollar was 0.94% firmer in terms of its index, buoyed by Trump’s speech and the rising rate hike expectations, after a few weeks during which some of the dollar bulls began to get disappointed at the pause in upward progress. The yield on the policy-sensitive 2-year US Treasury note rallied by just over 16.3 basis points over the week (to 1.3051%), while the yield on the 10-year Treasury closed up 16.6 basis points (to 2.4780%). Set against the equity bullishness, gold closed 1.8% down, at $1,234.81. Oil was little changed, at $53.33 for WTI, within a maintained pattern of unnaturally low volatility. In summary, what we saw last week seemed to be a slew of so-called ‘bullish divergences’ for equities, when one might normally have expected a bearish result, thus underling the momentum behind current market action. We remain overweight in developed market equities, especially in the US and Europe (and selectively in the emerging space), although accept the logic suggesting that some further broadening of equity participation is due.

“President Trump offset a perceived lack of detail by an otherwise flawless performance”

Trump’s speech was always going to be important for the markets. Probably the key point is that he came across as being presidential. His mode of delivery was almost flawless, and he hardly missed a beat. He was confident, patriotic, and conciliatory - even if unsurprisingly the Democrats weren’t accepting any of it. In terms of content, this was essentially a reiteration of the new Administration’s known intended policies, including the repeal and replacement of the Affordable Care Act (‘Obamacare’), a $1 trillion infrastructure plan (to be delivered over ten years), a 10% defence spending increase (already leaked the previous day), a further crackdown on immigration and the building of the Mexican wall. On the debit side, investors were hoping for some discussion of financial services (and other) industry regulation reductions, together with impending changes in taxation policies (including the border adjustment tax), together with more than a hint of how the sum total of planned expenditure was going to be paid for, as well as the cuts that would need to be made elsewhere. As mentioned earlier, the work of Trump’s senior advisors continues, and we are still confident that the financial minds that have been hired will deliver; the financing aspects are unlikely to be entirely conventional, but that should be expected. The initial response to the speech in the markets was strangely neutral, but then turned positive, suggesting that Trump had survived the test. Sure enough, investors do now need a steady diet of Trump specifics; fortunately, especially Treasury Secretary Mnuchin fully understands this. The bottom-line was that the markets wanted to see a believable, reasonable, and more measured Trump, and that is arguably what they got. So the Trump ‘reflation trade’ is back on (it was never off in our view), although expectations regarding the speed and profitability of it need to be kept realistic. Lastly, although the President repeated the need to keep drug prices under control, he did say he wanted the Food & Drug Administration to reduce drug approval times, a positive for the pharmaceutical (and certainly the biotech) sectors, the latter of which we referred to favourably in our recent ‘Outlook’.

“For Yellen and her FOMC colleagues, the markets have said it’s OK to move”

In a week of important speeches, Fed Chair Janet Yellen also gave one on Friday, before going into the ‘quiet period’ before the upcoming 14th-15th March FOMC meeting. As you can imagine, this was met with great interest, especially given the immense increase in rate rise expectations last week. Although the speech was largely referring to the historic conduct of Fed monetary policy, we couldn’t but help feel that her concluding comments had in a real sense been ‘signed-off’ by the markets, with a 94% priced-in probability telling the FOMC that it’s ‘OK to hike’, and fully discounting the move. Indeed there would now be disappointment if they do not. We reviewed the transcript and think the important takeaways are as follows: She said, “Looking ahead, we continue to expect the evolution of the economy to warrant further gradual increases in the target range for the federal funds rate. However, given how close we are to meeting our statutory goals, and in the absence of new developments that might materially worsen the economic outlook, the process of scaling back accommodation likely will not be as slow as it was in 2015 and 2016”. “A useful concept…is the ‘neutral’ real federal funds rate, defined as the level of the federal funds rate that, when adjusted for inflation, is neither expansionary nor contractionary when the economy is operating near its potential.” Continuing, “Last December…most FOMC participants assessed the longer-run value of the neutral real federal funds rate to be in the vicinity of 1%....reflecting, in part, slow productivity growth and an aging population not only in the United States, but also in many advanced economies”. “…With the actual value of the real federal funds rate currently near minus 1%, a near-zero estimate of the neutral real rate means that the stance of monetary policy remains moderately accommodative…”. Reading between the lines - and knowing their measure of inflation is just below the target, and that the basic measure of unemployment is at or very close to being at ‘full’ - the Fed’s officials know that unless they begin to raise rates now they’ll be left behind the curve, especially if Trump’s policies begin to kick-in constructively.

Ms Yellen continued: “My colleagues and I generally anticipate that the neutral real federal funds rate will rise to its longer-run level over the next few years. This expectation partly underlies our view that gradual increases in the federal funds rate will likely be appropriate in the months and years ahead…”. In our opinion, investors should underline ‘months’, however also ‘gradual’, with the latter being something that makes the markets very comfortable, given that investors have already accepted that in the absence of some unforeseen disaster, normalization has to happen. Of course if the Fed does subsequently find it needs to move faster, they will - yet the realization last week that the new Administration will face more obstacles than it would like is not all bad, as it makes the overall transition to a more business-friendly environment safer and more measured, and less debt will have to be used. Furthermore, Yellen said, “On the whole, the prospects for further moderate economic growth look encouraging, particularly as risks emanating from abroad appear to have receded somewhat” (this had been a central argument for back-pedaling on rate rises last year). “…Core PCE inflation - which excludes volatile energy and food prices and, therefore, tends to be a better indicator of future inflation - has been running near 1.75%...”, and “…In light of current economic conditions, such an increase (i.e. 0.75% - three rises this year, our italics) would be consistent with the Committee's expectation…”. She went on, “…my colleagues and I expect the neutral real federal funds rate to rise somewhat over the longer run, (therefore) we project additional gradual rate hikes in 2018 and 2019”. “To conclude…the economy has essentially met the employment portion of our mandate and inflation is moving closer to our 2% objective”. “I continue to have confidence in our judgment that a gradual removal of accommodation is likely to be appropriate. However, as I have noted, unless unanticipated developments adversely affect the economic outlook, the process of scaling back accommodation likely will not be as slow as it was during the past couple of years”. So as of last Friday night, we read ‘three hikes for this year’, in line with our Outlook expectations, and we don’t expect these to be disruptive for the markets.

“Indian GDP data generation is still being perfected”

Last week saw the publication of official Indian GDP data for the fourth quarter of calendar 2016, with annualized growth said to have fallen to 7.0%, from 7.4% in the third quarter, and vs. expectations in the region of 6.0-6.4%. Earlier assumptions had been that the hit from the demonetization of 86% of India’s currency last November had been severe, given the apparent overall effect on consumption and services following the daring move to counter the very large black economy. Our reading (and common sense) suggests that official estimates could not adequately measure what was actually happening in the so-called ‘unorganized’ (essentially cash-using) sectors, as data is by definition mainly derived from the ‘organized’ sectors. Also, there was a statistical effect due to the GDP growth estimate for the fourth quarter of 2015 being revised downwards by an annualized 0.8%, making for an easier comparison. We suspect that revisions will be made to official figures in the quarters to come. Fortunately, the underlying investment logic that we documented in the ‘Outlook’ remains very much in place, and Indian equities have performed well since November. Lastly, according to Kotak, if one adjusts for the lack of profitability of the public sector banks, the market P/E ratio falls to the 16-17x region for the current year.

MENA bond issuance continued apace last week. Majid Al Futtaim Holding LLC, rated BBB/BBB by S&P and Fitch, with stable outlooks, priced a $500 million 5.5-year non-callable perpetual bond, at a yield of 5.5%, down from initial higher indications. Expected ratings for the instrument were BB+/BB+ by S&P and Fitch. Qatar Reinsurance Company (QRe), the largest insurance company in the MENA region, mandated banks for a debut US$ perpetual bond issue. A debut USD denominated perpetual non-callable 5.5 year offering by QRe guaranteed by QIC should follow, subject to market conditions. Both QRe and QIC are rated A (stable, S&P), and the issuance is expected to be rated BBB+ by S&P. Bank of Sharjah PJSC, rated ‘BBB+’ by Fitch (and stable) priced a $500 million 5-year bond at a spread of 225bps over mid-swaps. Lastly, the Government of the Sultanate of Oman last week raised $5 billion of debt through a 3-tranche bond sale. The issuer priced a $1 billion 5-year bond at 190 basis points over mid-swaps. According to Reuters, the combined books for the 3-tranche deal were in excess of $19.5 billion, with orders skewed towards the 10 and 30-year bonds. The above offerings have generally been well-received; these are all quality issuers, continuing to underline the positive overall development of MENA bonds markets.

INVESTMENT SUMMARY: The NBAD Asset Allocation Committee meets later this week, until which investment policy remains unchanged.

For any inquiries related to this article, please contact Alain Marckus or Clint Dove.

Click here to download the article in PDF

Weekly Investment View - 05 March 2017

Disclaimer:
This report has been prepared and issued by the Global Asset Management (“GAM”) of the National Bank of Abu Dhabi PJSC (“NBAD”) outlining particular services provided by GAM and does not constitute or form part of any offer or invitation to sell, or any solicitation of any offer to purchase or subscribe for, any shares in NBAD or otherwise or a recommendation for a particular person to enter into any transaction or to adopt any strategy nor shall it or any part of it form the basis of or be relied on in connection with any contract therefore. This report was prepared exclusively for the benefit and internal use of NBAD. This report is incomplete without reference to, and should be viewed solely in conjunction with the associated oral briefing provided by GAM. The report is proprie-tary to GAM and may not be disclosed to any third party or used for any other purpose without the prior written consent of GAM. The information in this report reflects prevailing conditions and our views as of this date, which are accordingly subject to change. In preparing this report, we have relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of all the information available from public sources or which was otherwise reviewed by us. In addition, our analysis are not and do not purport to be appraisals of the assets, stock or business of the recipient. Even when this presentation contains a kind of appraisal, it should be considered preliminary, suitable only for the purpose described herein and not be disclosed or otherwise used without the prior written consent of GAM. NBAD clients may already hold positions in the assets subject to this report and may accordingly benefit from the buying or selling of such assets as referred to in this report. This document does not purport to set out any advice, recommendation or representation on the suitability of any in-vestment, transaction or product (as referred to in this document or otherwise), for potential purchasers. Potential purchasers should determine for themselves the relevance of the information contained in this document and the decision to purchase any investment contained herein should be based on such investigation and analysis as they themselves deem necessary. Before entering into any transaction potential purchasers should ensure that they fully understand the poten-tial risks and rewards of that transaction (including, without limitation, all financial, legal, regulatory, tax and accounting consequences of entering into the transaction and an understanding as to how the transaction will perform under changing conditions) and that they independently determine that the transac-tion is appropriate for them given their objectives, experience, financial and operational resources and other relevant circumstances. Potential purchasers should consider consulting with such advisers and experts as they deem necessary to assist them in making these determinations and should not rely on NBAD for such purposes. NBAD is acting solely in the capacity of a potential arm’s-length contractual counterparty and not as a financial adviser or fiduciary in any transaction unless we have otherwise expressly agreed so to act in writing. NBAD does not provide any accounting, tax, regulatory or legal advice. NBAD is licensed by the Central Bank of the UAE.

London

NBAD London Branch is Authorized by the Prudential Regulation Authority. Subject to regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority and limited regulation by the Prudential Regulation Authority. Details about the extent of our regulation by the Prudential Regulation Authority are available from NBAD London branch on request. Registered in England & Wales: Company No: FC009142: VAT No: GB245 3301 91.

Paris

NBAD Paris Branch is licensed by the French Prudential Control Authority as a credit institution. NBAD Paris is registered in France under the company number: RCS Paris B 314 939 547.

Switzerland

This publication is for your information only and is not intended as an offer, or a solicitation of an offer, to buy or sell any investment or other specific product. Certain services and products are subject to legal restrictions and cannot be offered worldwide on an unrestricted basis and/or may not be eligible for sale to all investors. All information and opinions expressed in this document were obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith, but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to its accuracy or completeness. All information and opinions as well as any prices indicated are currently as of the date of this report, and are subject to change without notice. The analysis contained herein is based on numerous assumptions. Different assumptions could result in materially different results. At any time the National Bank of Abu Dhabi PJSC and/or NBAD Private Bank (Suisse) SA may have a long or short position, or deal as principal or agent, in relevant securities or provide advisory or other services to the issuer of relevant securities or to a company connected with an issu-er. Some investments may not be readily realizable since the market in the securities is illiquid and therefore valuing the investment and identifying the risk to which you are exposed may be difficult to quantify. Futures and options trading is considered risky. Past performance of an investment is no guarantee for its future performance. Some investments may be subject to sudden and large falls in value and on realization you may receive back less than you invested or may be required to pay more. Changes in foreign exchange rates may have an adverse effect on the price, value or income of an investment. National Bank of Abu Dhabi PJSC expressly prohibits the distribution and transfer of this document to third parties for any reason. National Bank of Abu Dhabi PJSC and/or NBAD Private Bank (Suisse) SA will not be liable for any claims or lawsuits from any third parties arising from the use or distribution of this document. This report is for distribution only under such circumstances as may be permitted by applicable law. The “Directives on the Independence of Financial Research”, issued by the Board of Directors of the Swiss Bankers Association (SBA) do not apply.